Topic Closed
|
Forums at EliYah's Home Page
![]() Scripture Discussion Forum
![]() Yahshua is not YHWH. Yahshau was created. (Page 13)
|
This topic is 14 pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 |
next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: Yahshua is not YHWH. Yahshau was created. |
|
JudahLion Posts: 40 |
Lynn Trooper made some very valid points using Scripture. The last sentence you wrote, however, tells me why you were not able to respond to certain points. You said to Trooper: "I am honestly trying to share with you what YHWH has shown me through Yahshua." |
|
Dave52 Posts: 667 |
quote: No, we all have our own spirit and then when we are baptised with the Holy Spirit it is Yahweh coming to dwell in us for we are His temple (1Co 3:16). Yahshua was a human so he too had his own spirit and was filled with the HS as Yahweh dwelled in him as He does us. However, there are several verses that indicate there are two Holy Spirits, one from Yahweh the Father and one from Yahshua the Son. Ro 8:9 If so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Messiah, he is none of his. This would seem to indicate the Holy Spirit comes from Yahshua. And it does, sort of: Joh 15:26 When the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you FROM THE FATHER, even the Spirit of truth, which PROCEEDETH FROM THE FATHER. Everything Yahweh the Father is doing is through and for His Son. The HS was given before the resurrection directly by Yahweh but now all things proceed through the Son. Just as no one can approach unto the Father but through Yahshua the Son, so nothing is given unless it is given through the Son. Is it now Yahshua’s spirit, is it Messiah’s Holy Spirit? Yes, for Yahshua said, “All things that the Father hath are mine” (Joh 16:15). Why does Peter and Paul call the Holy Spirit the “Spirit of Messiah?” Because the Holy Spirit is now given in the name of Messiah, “The Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name” (Joh 14:26). Is there then more then one spirit? NO! 1Co 12:13 For by ONE SPIRIT are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into ONE SPIRIT.
quote: In the past Yahweh dwelt in the temple but now is very pleased to dwell in His Son. Not figuratively or partially, but fully, totally and completely. “Godhead” is only used three times in the NT and each time it is translated from a different Greek word. Here it is translated from #2320 theotes, the KJV translators coined the word “Godhead,” no doubt thinking in terms of the Trinity, rather then using divine or divinity as they did in other places. Theotes is from #2316 theos – God, its meaning pertains to Yahweh’s quintessence, which is the heart or core of Yahweh’s complete essence or being that dwells bodily in Yahshua, “For it pleased the Father that in him should all fulness dwell” (Col 1:19). However, despite what others might force this to say we must admit it says the Father DWELLETH in the Son. He didn’t become the Son or the Son didn’t become Yahweh. “Dwelleth” is a translation of #2730 katoikeo from #3611 oikeo-dwell. Yahweh dwelt in the temple (1Ki 8:27, Mt 23:21), although that was much different and so we can easily accept and understand the meaning of “dwelleth” when it relates to the temple or other believers, but seem to lose the meaning of the word when it is used in Col 2:9. This verse carries much the same meaning as Mt 1:23 and 2Co 5:19, Yahweh being spirit, was and is dwelling without measure in His Son. In Lu 11:26 eight unclean spirits dwelleth (2730) in a man and Ro 8:11 and 1Co 3:16 says God dwells in us. Now we know that doesn’t make any of us Yahweh any more then the temple was Yahweh, so why do people use Col 2:9 to tell us the Messiah is the Father? The Son epitomizes the purest and most concentrated form of Yahweh because he is the most typical example or representation of God. In the Son lodges Yahweh’s pure character, His divine nature, His honourable presence, His glorious power, His executive authority and much more. But wait, you and I can also be honoured in the same way. Yahshua is not the only one having the fullness of God but Paul says, “Ye might be filled with all the fulness of God” (Ep 3:19). Peter also tells us Yahweh’s promises are that “Ye might be partakers of the divine nature” (2Pe 1:4). So concerning Yahshua this is what Yahweh intended, He highly exalted His Son (Ps 8:5-6, Dan 7:14, Mt 28:18, Jn 5:26, Ac 2:36 & 5:31, Ro 8:11, 1Co 3:16, Ep 1:20-22, Php 2:9, 1Pe 3:22, 2Pe 1:17, Rev 5:12), but He did not turn Himself into His Son. |
|
Dave52 Posts: 667 |
quote: The scriptures couldn’t be more clear on this point. Ne 9:6 Thou, even thou, art Yahweh ALONE; thou hast made heaven. The Bible specifically points out that the name of the creator is Yahweh. Am 9:6 It is he that buildeth his stories in the heaven, and hath founded his troop in the earth; he that calleth for the waters of the sea, and poureth them out upon the face of the earth: Yahweh is his name. It appears Yahweh didn’t so much build the universe with His hands or with hard labour but simply told it to become what He said and it did. Yahweh’s Son, Yahshua, never claimed to have any part in creation, in fact he told us his Father did the creating. Mt 11:25 Yahshua answered and said, I thank thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth.
quote: Pr 30:4 Who hath ascended up into heaven, or descended? who hath gathered the wind in his fists? who hath bound the waters in a garment? who hath established all the ends of the earth? what [is] his name, and what [is] his son's name, if thou canst tell? This verse is stating that whoever “Hath established all the ends of the earth,” has a name and has a son, which makes him a father. Here we see the Father credited with creating everything and almost as an after thought it mentions His Son. There are 143 (possibly more) verses in the Bible that speak of the Heavenly Father Yahweh as the Creator. Ge 1:1, 11, 16, 21, 25, 27; 2:4, 7, 19, 22; 3:1; 5:1, 2; 6:7. Mt 11:25; 19:26. There is not a single verse in the Bible that tells us the Son, Yahshua Messiah, created the universe. However, many translator’s pre-conceived, indoctrinated beliefs led them to interpret scripture instead of doing their job of strictly translating. This has made a few verses appear to indicate the Son did the creating but at the same time they contradict the 100 plus verses that tell us the Father alone did the creating. Here they are. Jn 1:10 He (the Light vs 8) was in the world, and the world was made by (1223) him, and the world knew him not. #1223 dia; a primary preposition denoting the channel of an act. AV - by 241, through 88, with 16, for 58, for ... sake 47, therefore (+ 5124) 44, for this cause (+ 5124) 14, because 52, misc 86; total 646. Definition: by, by the means of, through, the ground or reason by which something is or is not done, by reason of, on account of, because of for this reason, on this account. #1519 eis; a primary preposition indicating the point reached or entered. AV - into 573, to 281, unto 207, for 140, in 138, on 58, toward 29, against 26, misc 322; total 1774. Definition: into, unto, to, towards, for, among, #1537 ek; a primary preposition denoting origin (the point whence action or motion proceeds), from, out (of place, time, or cause). AV - of 366, from 181, out of 162, by 55, on 34, with 25, misc 98; total 921. Definition: out of, from, by, away from Mr 2:27 He said unto them, The sabbath was made for (1223) man, and not man for (1223) the sabbath. Would you accept the doctrine you’ve been taught if you had to believe that the Sabbath was made BY man or that woman was created BY the man? Would you acknowledge that Yahshua was manifested BY you or that the saints were slain BY the word of God and BY their own testimony? Of course you would not because it would conflict with what the rest of the Bible teaches. Try and replace “because” or “because of” with “by” and see what happens. Jn 12:30 Yahshua answered and said, This voice came not because of (1223) me, but for (1223) your sakes. This small sample from many, effectively shows how “dia” is often translated “because” or “because of” or “for this cause.” The definition of “dia” is based on two primary causes: 1. Indicates the path of the action, often translated by, through, with; 2. The reason of the action, translated for, on account of, because of etc. Now when we read Jn 1:10 we see The world was made FOR or BECAUSE of (1223) him.. 1Co 8:6 shows us there is “One Master Yahshua Messiah, FOR (1223) whom are all things, and we BY or THROUGH (1223) him. Looking at Eph 3:9 it should read, “Hath been hid in God, who created all things FOR or BECAUSE of (1223) Yahshua Messiah. Any Father builds his business or empire to leave to his son and Heb 1:2 reveals this is what Yahweh has done. Yahweh (vs 1)“ hath in these last days spoken unto us by [his] Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, FOR (1223) whom also he made the worlds.” The Son is the heir not the creator, the Son inherits, as do all heirs, he does not bequeath. The Creator Yahweh created everything in order to bequeath it to His Son. The entire Bible is agreed that the Father creates and gives to the Son who accepts and receives, (Dan 7:14, Mt 28:18, Lu 1:32, Jn 13:3 & 16:15, Ac 2:36, Ro 8:17, 1Co 15:27, Ep 1:10 & 22, Phi 2:9-11, Col 1:19 and Heb 2:8). Read them and rejoice. Let’s now look at how the translators treated the Greek word “en” (1722). The writers of the KJV translated it 1902 times as “in” and 163 times as “by.” But in Col. 1:16, where “en” appears twice in the first sentence, they take the opportunity to make the Son the creator when they use the word “by” the first time (by him were all things created), but then have to revert back to “in” seven words later (that are in heaven). Col 1:16 For by (1722) him were all things created, that are in (1722) heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by (1223) him, and for (1519) him:17 And he is before all things, and by (1722) him all things consist. Yahweh saw fit to unfold and accomplish His design in Yahshua, just look for yourself at Jn 13:31-32; Ac 10:43; 2Co 1:19-20, 5:21, 13:4; Ep 1:4; Phi 3:9; Col 1:19, 2:6-10; 2Th 1:12; and 1Jn 2:5 where all things are in (en) him, not by him. Yahweh is glorified IN HIM. So Col 1:16, in order for it to conform to the NT theme, must also most definitely read: For IN him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created because of him, and for him: And he is before all things, and IN him all things consist.
quote: Why do you claim “This Person wants to have preeminence in all things.” It never says Messiah sought after any preeminence it only states that it was given to him. Heb 1:2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds; Yahweh the Father created everything and then after the Son obeyed Yahweh’s will the Father exalted him and bequeathed everything to the Son. 1Co 15:27 For he hath put all things under his feet. But when he saith all things are put under [him, it is] manifest that he is excepted, which did put all things under him. Yahshua has preeminence over everything except the Father for “The head of every man is Messiah; and the head of the woman is the man; and THE HEAD OF MESSIAH IS GOD” (1Co 11:3). |
|
Trooper Posts: 321 |
Hi Dave
quote: Please let me know when you have a sound answer.
quote: Are you saying you have been honored with the dwelling of the fullness of the "ElHead" bodily? Shalom |
|
Trooper Posts: 321 |
Hello again Dave
quote: I see your point about by and for. But you can also insert "in, at and on. So your argument is not very strong at all. We have to look at the context of the scripture. The following scripture is speaking about Yahshuah and gives a clue for translation. Col 1:16-18 For by Him all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All things were created through Him and for Him. 17 And He is before all things, and in Him all things consist. The scripture is speaking about One who is before all things. Therefore, the One before all things was the One who created everthing. The context of the scriptures gives the clue for translation. And He is before all things Or will you write this scripture off too?
quote: No, "that scripture" does not state "it was given to him" but it does say "That He might have." Now, I can see your point that that it might be given from your view of Yahshuah being 100% man. But understanding Yahuah is Yahshuah also, it would be something Yahuah sought after to save His people. BTW: Which is it? Heb 1:2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us for his Son,.....; Shalom [This message has been edited by Trooper (edited 06-28-2003).] |
|
Trooper Posts: 321 |
Lynn, if your going to speak against me, please get my quotes right and your replies in order and don't add to your replies. In other words don't misrepresent your own replies to me. Your quote of me: Posted 06-12-2003 04:21 PM Trooper Wrote: I would like to make only one statement pertaining to the issue All of what I said in my statement is as follows: Those who don't know Yahshuah well know Him as the Son of Elohim only. Those that know him well should know Him as the Father and the Son. For if you ask Yahshuah to show you the Father and if you should know Him well, He will respond, Have I been with you so long, and yet you have not known Me? John 14:8-9 Philip said to Him, "Master, show us the Father, and it is sufficient for us." Yahshuah said to him, [b]"Have I been with you so long, and yet you have not known Me, Philip? Yes you will say, "are you saying that I do not know Him well just because I don't know Him as the Father and the Son? This is absurd" But as you see Phillip did not know, but should have! And Yahshuah seems to think Phillip's question was a bit absurd, because Phillip had been with Yahshuah all that time. So take it up with Yahshuah and ask him to show you the Father and He will say again but only if you should know him well, "Have I been with you so long, and yet you have not known My Father?" NO, He said Have I been with you so long, and yet you have not known Me? This means we have to teach these scripture along with the other scriptures. These scriptures do not do away with the scriptures where Yahshuah speaks of his Father, nor does those scriptures do away with Yahshuah stating what He did. We must teach that Yahshuah said He was the Son and we must teach His reply to Phillip who asked show us the Father. "Have I been with you so long, and yet you have not known Me, Philip? He who has seen Me has seen the Father;
Shalom and Yahuah bless you!! [/b]---- You quote me again but leave out my points of why I said such a thing in a reply to you: 06-17-2003 02:43 AM Trooper Wrote: Here is what I said in reply to you.
quote: ( I had to ask the following twice before you addressed it.) Hey again But why does it say in the following scripture that Elohim created man in His OWN image instead of "Their"? Gen 1:27 So Elohim created man in his own image, in the image of Elohim created he him; male and female created he them. So in fact man was not created in their image and their likeness, but in HIS image. Should the following scriptures really read.....?? Gen 1:31 And Elohim saw every thing that they had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day. Gen 2:2 And on the seventh day Elohim ended his work which they had made; and they rested on the seventh day from all their work which they had made. Gen 2:18 And Yahuah Elohim said, It is not good that the man should be alone; We will make him an help meet for him. Gen 6:7 And Yahuah said, I will destroy man whom We have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that We have made them. Shalom
You write in you post to Judahlion as if you replied to me with ..... My Reply: But what you say is your reply is not in your original reply to me. Here is what you really said after you quote me: Shalom Trooper, You wrote:[b] Your reply: Because Yahshua was created in his Fathers own image too. The question is what image was he talkiing about /Physical Image or Spirtual image? 1 Cor 15:45 And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit. 46 Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that which is spiritual. One thing you might be over looking in the OT, there is more than one Elohim mentioned, and they even talked to each other. Some scriptures even say YHWH Elohim. So when it only says Elohim, then you must make sure you know what Elohim it is reffering to. Blessings, Lynn ---End of quote ----Well, I did not know that there were more than ONE Elohim. You are way off base here and are boarding on teaching heresy.---- [/b] You quote me again to Judahlion: On 06-18-2003 06:57 PM Trooper wrote: I believe where most get confused is they believe that the "Image" (first born) created and used to create man in the Image of Elohim, had it's own personality. But in fact it was just an image Yahuah used to create His people and redeem them too. There is no way Yahuah could create man in His Image if he did not first create an image to create his people by, because He is invisible. When most came from christianty to the true faith, they removed one from the trinity. They just have one more to go so there will only be ONE our Redeemer, YAHshUAH, YOD-HAY-Shin-WAW-ayin-HAY. Yet you write the following to Judahlion as if it was the original reply to my post. My Reply: Col 1:14 In whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins: 15 Who is the image of the invisible Elohim, the firstborn of all creation. But your next reply to me was really as follows.... Seven candles have seven flames. Without the fire they have no purpose to exist. When they come together, they become as one light to shine the same glory of the consuming fire. No man has seen the face of YHWH and lived. We have seen the face of the Sun, and we have seen the face of his Son. YHWH is not the Sun, nor is he the Son. YHWH created the Sun, and YHWH created his Son. Fear YHWH, and try to understand the spiritual things that are not of this world. Also beware of the lying pen of BAAL. I am very aware of those scriptures. Lynn [/b] Was your following question supposed to be a question you asked me in that same post (I can't find it) or are you asking me know? In your last statement, who are you saying that people need to remove next? ----Why do you think I said "Lynn since you are posting to me again can you go back and answer other questions I have asked of you?--- You qoute me again to Judahlion: On 06-27-2003 11:51 PM Trooper Wrote: Yet again, you write as if it was the original reply to my post My Reply: Sripture says there are seven spirits of Elohim, and when your born again you receive a new spirit of Elohim, not a ruwach of your own. The body is the assembly that comes to YHWH Father through his son Yahshua. Yet, again what you reply here is not your original reply that followed my post. Seven candles have seven flames. Without the fire they have no purpose to exist. When they come together, they become as one light to shine the same glory of the consuming fire. No man has seen the face of YHWH and lived. We have seen the face of the Sun, and we have seen the face of his Son. YHWH is not the Sun, nor is he the Son. YHWH created the Sun, and YHWH created his Son. Fear YHWH, and try to understand the spiritual things that are not of this world. Also beware of the lying pen of BAAL. I am very aware of those scriptures. Lynn [/b] You qoute me again to JudahLion On 06-28-2003 Trooper wrote Since you are posting to me again, can you go back to the last three questions I asked and answer them. My Reply: On 06-16-2003 05:17 PM, As you can see by this post, I had already responded to Trooper on the exact same questions, and many more. Dave52 also did a good job in responding to Trooper. Oh, do you believe David52 who it trying to teach all of us that Yahshuah did not pre-exist? Because that's what he is teaching and what you are saying is a good job. No you did not respond, for you were not even posting to me. The three questions have nothing to do with this the topic of this thread!! You even said you were not aware of the questions. He is a qoute from you about the questions. You wrote: [b]Since you are posting to me again, can you go back to the last three questions I asked and answer them. I am sure you know what they are My Reply: I don't know what questons they are, but if you wish to repost them to me, I will do my best to respond according to scripture if possible.
[/b]
Posted at 06-28-2003 03:14 AM, Trooper wrote misquoted scripture: 1 Thess 5:20 Test all things; hold fast what is good. Posted 06-28-2003 02:28 AM, Trooper wrote: My Reply: I never said or suggested such things and I already reponded to you on this in a previous posts, so why do you keep repeating many same questions? It was a question! And why have you now added the following words as if it was in your reply? ""and I already reponded to you on this in a previous posts, so why do you keep repeating many same questions?"" You wrote:[b] Lynn So Yahuah did not stretcheth forth the heavens alone nor spreadeth abroad the earth by Himself, but needed a second person to do this. Is this correct? Shalom My Reply: I never said such things against scripture. What I am saying is that Elohim created the heavens and the earth. Then the spirit OF Elohim came to the earth. Elohim created Yahshua as the first born of all living creation, and YHWH Elohim put all things under Yahshua. Lynn [This message has been edited by Lynn (edited 06-28-2003).] [/b] You quote me again to JudahLion: Posted 06-28-2003 02:52 AM, Trooper wrote: My Reply: I never said that either. He has misquoted what I said by removing one important word out of my previous post, and again he keeps asking the same question but with a new twist. I wrote at: http://www.eliyah.com/forum2/Forum10/HTML/000292-14.html Scripture says that ELOHIM created the heavens and the earth, and that all things within the heavens and within the earth where created by/through Yahshua, but note that Yahshua also said he did nothing of himself or without the Father. I am sorry,i did not intentionally leave out the word within. I did not know leaving out the word "Within" made any difference considering scriptures. I thought you knew the scriptures teach that the worlds were created through Yahshuah and not things just within the heaven and earth. Heb 1:2 has in these last days spoken to us by His Son, whom He has appointed heir of all things, [b]through whom also He made the worlds; John 1:10 He was in the world, and the world was made through Him, and the world did not know Him But, I see you are not providing scriptrues were it is supposed to say "and all things within the heavens and within the earth where created by, through Yahshua." Did I miss this scripture? [/b] At this point I feel that Trooper is misquoting and altering scriptures, and certain statements that I made. I and others have shared many scriptures to show what the Word really says, but he seems to ignore them. I don't mind debates when it leads to more truths for those including myself that is seeking truths and proof by scripture. However when someone refuses to listen and except what the scriptures say, and if they teach falsely against what the scriptures say, or twist scriptures and statements that others have made, then what's the point to continue?
Wow I am amazed! This has happened to me many times on a Christian forum, but never by a brother on a true faith forum. You misrepresent your own replies to me by altering your replies, making up replies, add to your replies and alter the order of your replies to me. Then say you have answered many of my questions, but posted that you did not remember my questions. Then you make me out to be the bad guy. If this is exposing someone and proving all things I want no part of it! I do pray that all will be well. Shalom [This message has been edited by Trooper (edited 06-29-2003).] |
|
Trooper Posts: 321 |
Again:
quote: Shalom Lynn "Within" does not change any point to your statement. If you do not want to be questioned/tested for what you teach in the face of scripture then so be it. But a true teacher of Yahuah will!! You wrote: Scripture says that YHWH created the heavens and the earth, and that all things within the heavens and within the earth where created by/through Yahshua, but note that Yahshua also said he did nothing of himself or without the Father. If Yahuah said He created all things, stretched out the heavens all alone and spread abroad the earth by Himself, then there was no second person when Yahuah created anything! Isa 44:24 Thus says Yahuah, your Redeemer, And He who formed you from the womb: The scriptures are clear. Yahshuah (image and form of Elohim) created the worlds and all things and without Him nothing was made that was made. Heb 1:1-3 has in these last days spoken to us by His Son, whom He has appointed heir of all things, through whom also He made the worlds; John 1:3 All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made. Hence no second person before, at or during creation!! Praise YAH, Yahuah my Yahshuah HaMashiach!! Shalom |
|
Dave52 Posts: 667 |
quote: Eph 3:19 And to know the love of Christ, which passeth knowledge, that YE MIGHT BE FILLED WITH ALL THE FULNESS OF GOD. I am not saying I am, only that the saints “might be filled with all the fulness of God.” Do you agree with this verse? Anyway, how do you see Col. 2:9 and what is it telling you?
quote: To describe how Yahshua now holds preeminence over all the universe the Bible uses several phrases to say this: Higher than the kings (Ps 89:27) ”Before all things” doesn’t mean before, as in time, but before as in superior or above all things. But who made him Higher than the kings? 1Co 15:27 For he hath put all things under his feet. But when he saith all things are put under him, it is manifest that HE IS EXCEPTED, which did put all things under him. What is all this about if you think he has pre-eminence because he is Yahweh and was before all creation. 1Co 8:6 But to us there is but one God, the Father, of (1537) whom are all things, and we in him; and one Master Yahshua Messiah, by (1223) whom are all things, and we by (1223) him. Notice God the Father “ek” all things. “Ek” denotes origin and is never used when talking about Yahshua. #1537 ek; a primary preposition denoting origin (the point whence action or motion proceeds), from, out (of place, time, or cause). AV - of 366, from 181, out of 162, by 55, on 34, with 25, misc 98; total 921. Definition: out of, from, by, away from quote: I never said “en” couldn’t be translated “by” if the context required it. “Spoken unto us for his Son” would not have any support in the rest of the scriptures. #1722 en ~ AV-in 1902, by 163, with 140, among 117, at 113, on 62, through 39, misc 265; 2801. Spoken unto us at his Son Neither would those. Like you said, “We have to look at the context of the scripture” plus how it fits the overall doctrine of scriptures |
|
Dave52 Posts: 667 |
Col 1:15 Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature: 16 For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: 17 And he is before all things, and by him all things consist. 18 And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead. If this speaks of Yahshua as the creator of every single thing and the beginning of the beginning there are a few questions that need clarification. How could he be his own image? How could Trooper be the image of Trooper? I think you are looking at “firstborn” or “the beginning” to mean Yahshua existed before anything else which doesn't fit the overall view of scripture. Col 1:15, “Who (the Son vs 13) is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature (2937).” Ktisis, #2937, is translated creature or creation. Was the Son the first act of creation by the Father? Trinitarians must say no, since they advocate he was with the Father before the beginning, and other pre-existent promoters say he was the creator. Then what does this verse say? It says the Son was the “firstborn,” not the first created. If we say Cain was the firstborn human, how could someone born thousands of years afterwards be so designated? As we study the following verses it becomes perfectly clear. Ps 102:18 This shall be written for the generation to come: and the people which shall be created shall praise Yahweh. Yahweh created Adam the first human and this present world, the scriptures state He will also create a new world and newly created beings as well. David said the generation to come are those “which shall be created,” created by Yahweh’s spirit. Yahweh says in Isaiah He will “create new heavens and a new earth.” Hebrews calls it “the world to come,” and in Revelation John hears Yahweh say, “Behold, I make all things new.” This new creation has already been started, with Yahshua the Son the beginning of it. Those at the first resurrection will follow Yahshua and be born again or created into this new world to come. 1Co 15:20 But now is Messiah risen from the dead, and become the firstfruits of them that slept. The “firstfruits” of the harvest should always be offered to Yahweh in thanksgiving. Yahshua said, “The harvest is the end of the world” (Mt 13:39) and in Rev 14:15 we see the harvest begin. Read these precious promises: Ro 8:29 For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren. Yahshua is “the firstborn among many brethren,” but it says he “is the beginning,” just the beginning. Those who are to follow him and be like him are “written in heaven.” Yes indeed Yahweh’s Son is the beginning of Yahweh’s creation, not the creation that began with Adam but this new creation that has begun with Yahshua. Remember, Paul said Adam was “the figure of him that was to come” (Ro 5:15), meaning Yahshua, and he refers to Adam as “the first man,” calling the Messiah “the last Adam” (1Co 15:45). Col 1:17 He is before all things, and by* him all things consist. Here again we have a statement that appears to say the Son was before the creation, before, as in first in time. In the vast majority of cases the Greek word “pro” does mean just that, however it also can be defined as superior to or greater than. Our English word “before,” according to Webster’s, can also denote being “in a higher or more important position than.” “Pro” was translated as “above” in Ja 5:12 and 1Pe 4:8, indicating the superior or greater thing. Paul is declaring the Son to be the greatest of all, just as Yahshua said himself he was “above all” (Jn 3:31). In verse 18 Paul uses the term “preeminence” (NIV supremacy) to emphasis the Messiah is greater then all, not first in time but first in place or position. The following scriptures attest to this fact: Ps 89:27, Isa 52:13, Mt 23:8 & 28:18, Jn 3:35, Ac 10:36, Ro 9:5, 1Co 15:47, Ep 1:21, Phi 2:9-11, Heb 1:6, 1Pe 3:22, Rev 5:12 & 19:16. The New Testament declares the Son to be superior to and above everyone and everything with the exception of the Father, and to Him and Him only is the Son subordinate (1Co 15:28). As for the word “by” see the meaning of the Greek word “en” in the section “Which Creator.” |
|
Trooper Posts: 321 |
Thank you Dave for taking the time to answer the questions.
quote: Yes, I agree with the verse. We should be filled with the fullness of Yahuah. However, I do not believe this pertains to being filled with the fullness of the ElHead bodily. I believe this is two different things and only one is worthy of such a fullness. Shalom and YAH bless! |
|
Dave52 Posts: 667 |
quote: SEEN THE FATHER What is John telling us, that Yahshua literally saw Yahweh with his human eyes? Yahweh has said, “Thou canst not see my face: for there shall no man see me, and live” (Ex 33:20). Yahshua was a man and subject to death so how could he see Yahweh and live? Jn 15:21 But all these things will they do unto you for my name's sake, because they know (1492) not him that sent me. 22 If I had not come and spoken unto them, they had not had sin: but now they have no cloke for their sin. 23 He that hateth me hateth my Father also. 24 If I had not done among them the works which none other man did, they had not had sin: but now have they both seen (3708) and hated both me and my Father. Yet here Yahshua appears to contradict himself, for he tells us not only he himself has seen (3708) the Father but the world also has “both seen (3708) and hated” Him. To correctly see (understand) what is what, we must check out the Greek words. #3708 horao; AV - see 51, take heed 5, behold 1, perceive 1, not tr 1; total 59; Definition: to see with the eyes, see with the mind, to perceive, know, to experience, to take heed, beware, to care for. #1097 ginosko; AV - know 196, perceive 9, understand 8, misc 10; total 223; Definition: perceive, understand, learn to know, get knowledge of, perceive, feel, become acquainted with. #1492 oida or eido; AV - know 281, cannot tell + 3756 8, know how 7, wist 6, misc 19, see 314, behold 17, look 6, perceive 5, vr see 3, vr know 1; total 667; Definition: to see or perceive with the eyes or any of the senses, notice, discern, discover, to pay attention, observe, to inspect, examine, to look at, behold, to visit, to know, i.e. get knowledge of, understand. W. E. Vine: “The differences between ginosko (1097) and oida (1492) demand consideration: (a) ginosko, frequently suggests inception or progress in knowledge, while oida suggests fulness of knowledge.” Example: “Ye (Jews) have not known (ginosko) him; but I know (oida) him” (Jn 8:55). The Jews didn’t attempt to know Yahweh but Yahshua knew Him perfectly.” So in Jn 15:21-24 above, Yahshua is saying that the Jews didn’t perfectly know (oida) the Father but because of the extraordinary works that he displayed they couldn’t help but be aware he was of God and so ignorance will not excuse them from this sin of rejecting both the Father and His Son. HE THAT HAS SEEN ME HAS SEEN THE FATHER It was not an actual bodily sighting of the Father (see definitions above), but a mental awareness of the Father’s characterizes that they were observing (See Ac 8:23 where horao is used). How can we be sure Yahshua is speaking of a mental not a visual picture? Look at this verse, “No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him” (Jn 1:18). In order for us to see the Father, Yahshua has had to declare Him, he didn’t draw a picture or say that he himself was the Father but declared Him in words and deeds. That is why he was able to say “and from henceforth ye have seen him.” Consider it said that the disciples saw Yahweh. To further confirm this, when Yahshua spoke to Philip he used the word know* (1097) four times, he expected they would by now be acquainted and identify with him and his Father, that they would understand the Father and Son. Our English word “see” can also be used to stand in for words such as, distinguish, perceive, understand, observe, grasp, comprehend, refer to, consider, investigate, realize, and get the message (no pun intended). So in Jn 14:8-10 he isn’t saying what you are looking at is the Father, because even Oneness say that His body was the Son not the Father and Oneness believe the Father is spirit and the Son is the human man. Yahshua doesn’t say He is the Father but ends the passage by saying, “the Father that dwelleth in me” (vs. 10). Why do some insist this passage says the Son is the Father, one person? We could assume this to be one of the meanings you could draw from it even thought it doesn’t say that. In a large percentage of the uses of horao it is translated, “See thou tell no man” or “see that ye be not troubled,” not in the sense of seeing with the eyes but seeing with the mind. Read this next verse. Jn 16:25 These things have I spoken unto you in proverbs: but the time cometh, when I shall no more speak unto you in proverbs, but I shall shew* (312) you plainly of the Father. *#312 anaggello; AV - tell 6, show 6, declare 3, rehearse 1, speak 1, report 1; total 18; Definition: to announce, make known, to report, bring back tidings, rehearse. Yahshua also says, “Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me?” Many think for him to be in the Father must make him the Father. Read the next verses. Jn 14:20 I [am] in my Father, and ye in me, and I in you. We are in the Father, the Father is in us, the Son is in the Father, we are in the Son and so forth, but are we all one? Does this make us all one person? Everybody says of course not! Does it make the Father and Son one person? Oneness, without thinking, automatically says, yes of course! 1Co 6:17 He that is joined unto the Master is one spirit. Remember there is only one spirit, the Father. If we are in the one spirit and the one spirit is in us we are one, but not one person. The same applies to the Saviour. Go back to “Incarnate or Manifest?” and “The Son reveals the Father,” there you will find more evidence that Yahshua’s goal or mission was to be able to say, “He that hath seen me hath seen the Father,” and to be understood. Finally we turn to 3Jo 1:11, “He that doeth good is of God: but he that doeth evil hath not seen God.” John used the word horao here just as he did to describe the exchange between Yahshua and Philip, those that do good understand and know God even though we have yet to see Him with our physical eyes. But John says those that do evil (that is the world) “Hath not seen God,” however at the top of this subject in Jn 15:24 he wrote that Yahshua said the world has “Both seen (horao) and hated both me and my Father.” How can the world see and yet not see? The answer is in the wide range the English word “see” and the Greek word “horao” both encompass. Yahshua could say the world couldn’t help but see the physical works he performed had to be divine, despite the fact they were in denial and deceived by their own lust and power by the flesh. Whereas John points out that to see God, not physical acts performed by His servants, but to perceive Him with your heart and spirit leads one to do good not evil deeds. |
|
Dave52 Posts: 667 |
quote: So tell us what is “bodily” to you? How does that word make a difference? |
|
Trooper Posts: 321 |
Dave Just for a bit look at the Son in a different light and tell me if it is possible for Yahuah to do this. Look at the Son as just an image and vessel of honor, for in which Yahuah used, filled and dwelled in. But please remember the image and vessel of honor is not Yahuah, but the only Person inside this image and vessel of honor is Yahuah. Yahuah wanted to create man in His Image and Likeness. However, He is invisible and has no shape or form to do this. In order for Yahuah to create a being after His Image and likeness He first needs a patteren, a blueprint so to speak. So He first creates himself an Image (firstborn) to create His people by. He then uses this same image to create Adam and breaths into the form He created "in His image" and man becomes a living soul. Now since an image was needed to create Adam in Yahuah's image, Elohim/YAH became plural for the creation of His people. This is why there is but One True Elohim but the meaning is plural, for He can do all things and be any thing He wants to be. Therefore all things are created by/through this same Image, and He (the person) is before all things. In a sense the Image is also before all things because it was created first then the worlds and man was created. Yahuah's creation of Adam fell into sin. So our Redeemer's image was born into this world with the Ruwach to save His People from their sins. This image was called the Son of Elohim. This image (not person) died on the tree, but the Ruwach in Him raised the body from the dead. Because of all of this, this Image with Yahuah's Ruwach dwells at the right hand of the Father and will forver remain as High Priest for the people He redeemed. This same image will be used in the day and time of the new earth as a way for Yahuah to walk with His people in the same form they are in. Does Yahuah have the ability to do all of this in the same fashion? Shalom [This message has been edited by Trooper (edited 06-29-2003).] |
|
Trooper Posts: 321 |
quote: Hey Dave It is not just the word "Bodily," but the word Elhead and its meaning used with the word bodily. For in Him (Yahshuah) dwells all the Fullness of the Elhead bodily. Meaning, as pure Deity in a bodily form. Shalom
[This message has been edited by Trooper (edited 06-29-2003).] |
|
david_ben_yacob Posts: 1131 |
Dear Brethren, Yahushua contained the fulness of Eloah according to Collosians 2:9 and verse 10 say "we are complete/full in Him"... Col 2:8 Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Messiah.
2320 theotes (theh-ot'-ace);from 2316; divinity (abstractly): KJV-- godhead. If my memory serves me correctly this word "Godhead" is Elah in the Aramaic text complete-4137 pleroo (play-ro'-o);from 4134; to make replete, i.e. (literally) to cram (a net), level up (a hollow), or (figuratively) to furnish (or imbue, diffuse, influence), satisfy, execute (an office), finish (a period or task), verify (or coincide with a prediction), etc.: KJV-- accomplish, X after, (be) complete, end, expire, fill (up), fulfil, (be, make) full (come), fully preach, perfect, supply. Col 4:12 Epaphras, who is one of you, a servant of Messiah, saluteth you, always labouring fervently for you in prayers, that ye may stand perfect and complete in all the will of Elah. John 1:15 John bare witness of him, and cried, saying, This was he of whom I spake, He that cometh after me is preferred before me: for he was before me.16 And of his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace. Yahushua was indwelt with the fullness of Eloah. Paul here is writing against the Platonistic Greek philosophy that was popular among both Greeks and Jews of this day since Philo of Alexandria Egypt used this philosphy to show the "Debar" Greek "Logos" English "the Word" of Yahueh to be similar to the the imination off of Yahueh Plato spoke of. Gnosticism was on the rise and infilterating all belief systems with this Platonic Greek philosophy. It even in used in the Aramiac Targums refered to as the Memra if my memory serves me correctly. It goes all the way back into the early mystery religions and Jewish mystical writings of the Kabballah. Gnosticism taught that "Matter" was evil therefor to achieve a higher state one must put off this body of matter. Paul and Yachanon/John in their writing implicitly denied this philosophy and preached against it in their epistles. "Pleroma" is the word used to express in this Greek philosophy the pure state of spirit being much as the Hindus & "New Age" (sic) use the term "nirvana" coming from the same idea and source; Babylon ultimatly. Marcion a Gnostic taught that the god of the Old Testament was Satan because he created matter.(Remember Yahueh says it is "good" and "very good".) He taught that only Paul's writings were for us today. Sound familiar? And yet Paul in this passage blows Gnostic basis tenents out of the water because here Paul tells us that we can achieve a higher state in Yahushua alone while in bodies of mater through recieving fulness or completeness in Messiah or the Anointing that Yahushua indwells us with, in our sinful flesh cleansed by the blood of Yahushua to prepare us for this wonderful infilling of the Spirit. The point I am making is that Yahushua has all authority and is indwelt with the fullness of Yahueh who is the only true Elah. We are not indwelt with this fullness of Yahueh but we are made complete or full in the Messiah( Anointed Anointer) Yahushua as we can be by obeying the glad tidings Yahushua gave to the Apostles to preach passing on this ministry of reconciliation to us in this time who have recieved of this same Spirit to empower us to live above sin and witness to all nations His message of hope. 2 Cor 5:17 Therefore if any man be in the Anointing, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new. So then Yahushua was not an angelic imination(Hebrew chapter one confirms this)seperate from the Father but the spoken Word of the ultimate creation of Yahueh: a temple which Yahueh in all His fullness dwells. Yahueh in matter or flesh at which Satan and all the demonic host tremble! \o/HalleluYah\o/ This is why that only through Yahushua can one recieve this redemption from Satan and his minions of deception because it is all in Him. The name of Yahushua is the only name of deliverance and salvation! \0/HalleluYah\o/
[This message has been edited by david_ben_yacob (edited 06-29-2003).] |
This topic is 14 pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 All times are ET (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Topic Closed |
|
Please read the disclaimer. If you see any violations of forum guidelines, please contact the moderator.
Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47e