Re: Sanhedrins in the First Century

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forum at www.eliyah.com/forum/ ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Jeff Persyn on December 30, 1997 at 07:28:56:

In Reply to: Sanhedrins in the First Century posted by D'vorah on December 18, 1997 at 17:03:14:

:
: I agree with this. =)

:
: Apart from this Sanhedrin was another one. This one is mentioned
: by Josephus. This Sanhedrin was a political body which was an instrument of Rome. This Sanhedrin was presided over by the High Priest and made up of Pharisees and Saduceees (but not Essenes or Nazarenes).

: I submit that it was the second of these two that condemned Yeshua and Ya'akov HaTzadik.

If this is true, then it would appear that Joseph of Arimathaea
was a member of the political Sanhedrin since it states
that he DID NOT consent to their counsel Luke 23:50-53.
Do you think this is possible?

Shalom

Follow Ups:

Re: Sanhedrins in the First Century D'vorah 13:39:22 12/30/97 (2)

Re: Sanhedrins in the First Century John Martin 21:59:17 7/05/98 (0)

Re: Sanhedrins in the First Century Jeff Persyn 09:19:15 12/31/97 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:
Subject:
Comments:
: : : : : I agree with this. =) : : : : Apart from this Sanhedrin was another one. This one is mentioned : : by Josephus. This Sanhedrin was a political body which was an instrument of Rome. This Sanhedrin was presided over by the High Priest and made up of Pharisees and Saduceees (but not Essenes or Nazarenes). : : I submit that it was the second of these two that condemned Yeshua and Ya'akov HaTzadik. : : : If this is true, then it would appear that Joseph of Arimathaea : was a member of the political Sanhedrin since it states : that he DID NOT consent to their counsel Luke 23:50-53. : Do you think this is possible? : Shalom
Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forum at www.eliyah.com/forum/ ] [ FAQ ]