Re: Br Clif Responds...

Subject:

Comments:
: : : : Br. Clif wrote: : Tamar wrote: : : snip! :) : : Shalom.. : : A question..seems you have went from first claiming Paul was false..and now..you are throwing out the gospel of Luke as well...my question is... : Ever since I found out that Luke was a disciple of Shaul/Sheol I have been holding Loukas in doubt. This is no new thing, so don't try to make it seem that way. I have held this position about Luke since before I met you, I believe. : : : : Do you accept all of the apocrypha, pseudepigrapha, New Testament apocrypha, Gnostic scripture, etc. as canonical, authoritative writing? : That was my question to YOU, my dear, dear Sister. Don't try to throw it back in my face without answering it, yourself. I made a point with that question, a point which your "snip" above has tried to emasculate. If you are going to ACCEPT scripture without inspection, why don't you accept the above scripture without inspection? : : Please tell me what you do accept as true. : : I just want to know which of those you've tossed out as false in your search. : <a href="http://qumran.com/brclif/catalogs.htm">http://qumran.com/brclif/catalogs.htm</a> : You do not trust what I have said regarding the bogus books of the New Testament, so why should you trust my opinion regarding the books above? : Find your own pearls, my Sis, if you won't accept the ones I have offered you. : : Tamar : With the Greatest Kind of Love, : Br. Clif : P.S.: Just because Mark got his account from Kefa/Peter (so the story goes) does this mean that Kefa knew that Mark was a disciple or faithful cohort of Shaul/Sheol when he confided in him with these things?

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL: